Jan Šinágl angažovaný občan, nezávislý publicista

Where would we be if persons with their noses and mouths uncovered were corseting our cemeteries !

***

Another example of the "activities" of these obvious psychopaths. On 3.3.2021, as the only representative of the public, I said goodbye to my friend Colonel v.v. Josef Musil. An unbelievable anabasis began, which was concluded only on 31.5.2023. See what all one photograph, without a veil and in the open air without people, i.e. in public without the public, caused - in the PROTOCOL of the insight into the file. How many hours did the officials have to spend on this and how much money did it cost the taxpayers! Already PK Hořovice should have postponed it, when the photo itself is proof of the senselessness of the denunciation and deliberate harassment by the MM Agency.

Already two days after the farewell at the Pardubice Crematorium (5.3.2021), the MM Agency reacted by filing a complaint for violation of the law and endangering the population by not wearing a veil. It was not until 31.5.2023 that I learned from the entire offence file the name of the informer Mgr. Jana Gavlasová in the study room of the KHS Pardubice, i.e. only after more than two years when I was denied the right to study the entire offence file by the KHS Pardubice. Interestingly, the Communication of the Ministry of Health dated 24.1.2023, from the end of which I quote:

... In conclusion, the Ministry states that it has investigated the manner in which the complainant's complaint was dealt with as set out in the KHS letter No. KHSPA 13345/2021/R-Pce, dated 11.8.2021, and for the reasons stated above, it found the complaint to be partially justified. The KHS was required to keep the order of the MoI on file under file No. S-KHSPA 05097/2021 and should have issued an order under Section 38(5) of the Administrative Procedure Code on the denial of inspection of a part of the file, or allowed the complainant to inspect the order of the MoI in such a way that the identity of the whistleblower of the alleged offence was protected at the same time.