Jan Šinágl angažovaný občan, nezávislý publicista

We, the undersigned citizens, express our disagreement with the decision of the Brno Regional Court - Zlín Branch in the Slopné murder case. David Šimon and Maroš Straňák have been in prison for over 11 years. When requesting a retrial in 2024, the court did not take into account the new, crucial evidence presented by Seznam Zprav reporters Adéla Jelínková and Christine Havranová. The new evidence refutes the original evidence and points to possible other perpetrators of the murder. This case, reported in the podcast Slopné: Who is the murderer?, has shaken the public and sparked a debate about justice in our country. We consider the justice system's handling of this case to be unjust and demand the following steps:

1.We demand that the Slopné murder case be reopened and that new evidence not be downplayed - but instead thoroughly investigated.

2.We demand that the investigation be conducted in a transparent manner, with an emphasis on objectivity and fairness.

By signing THIS PETITION, we express our support for a fair and transparent judicial process and ask the relevant authorities to take immediate steps to remedy this situation.

Kristýna Gárská Contact the author of the petition

***

Regional Court Zlín 24.6.2024 Slopné: Will the trial be resumed, apparently threatening the unfair practices of the police and armourers?!

Regional Court Zlín Slopné 15.7.2024: "Primitive" from Letná in Prague 1. Mai 2005 had to call things by their real name again!

Updated 26.7.2024: Petition for a fair trial in the Slopné murder case

***

"Moral values are the motivating force behind human behaviour. By pronouncing moral judgment, we protect the clarity of our own perception and the rationality of the direction we have chosen."

 Ayn Rand's THE HONESTY OF THE WORLD

***

A flagrant violation of the law, in no way comparable to the political trials of the 1950s. Those who have not been, seen or heard will not believe the judicial monstrosity going on in an EU member state! I could not keep silent and just watch, remembering the May Day of the communists in Letná in 2005.

Listen to Part I of the hearing, where I directly ask the presiding judge Ing. Bc. Lubomír Koliba, whether he is a police officer in the GIBS? He confirmed that he is (more in the link below). The closing speech of the defense attorney of Maros Straňák, Josef Bartončík (11:39) was excellent (the defense attorney of David Šimon, Dr. Robert Cholenský, was not present). 

In the second part of the hearing there followed a Resolution that had nothing to do with common sense and justice - pure alibism and self-defence of Judge Mgr. Pavel Dvorský. In style, nothing new, on the original evidence, everything in perfect order. On new unchallenged evidence, he questions or relativizes almost everything. It admits no doubt and flagrantly, knowingly, violates the legal principle of "when in doubt, in favour of the accused". He constantly, pre-emptively threatens the public with being escorted out of the courtroom (at least he no longer issues fines, which he also once "honoured" me with).

He mistakenly removed me (30:45) from the courtroom (further evidence of how he was "preoccupied" with my presence). After the hearing was over, I had already spoken (46:50). I was pleased that several people thanked me for my "closing statement". The road to hell awaits many actors in this criminal case directed by the Police, the judiciary and the criminal structures connected to them. Even the priest who preferred not to disclose confessional secrets to freeing two young, innocent people will probably not avoid it.

It is not surprising that the media do not mention the murdered Miroslav Sedlář, who was murdered not because of a jewellery robbery but because of illegal modifications of weapons for the Slovak police and mafia. It is quite possible that Ján Kuciak and his girlfriend were shot with his modified gun...

Full Article in Czech>